Ceramic On Ceramic Vs Ceramic On Polyethylene

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes health related quality of life hrql and wear of the bearing surface between ceramic on ceramic coc and ceramic on highly cross linked polyethylene coxpe tha for patients of avn after midterm.

Ceramic on ceramic vs ceramic on polyethylene.

With polyethylene plating in some cases when they stand alone there is no requirement for any backing material such as aramid. Polyethylene plates weigh between two to five pounds which make them lighter in comparison to steel and up to seventy percent lighter compared to ceramic plates. This randomized clinical trial determined how ceramic on ceramic ceramic bearing tha affected joint specific pain function and stiffness and prosthesis fixation longevity over 10 postoperative years compared with ceramic on highly crosslinked polyethylene polyethylene bearing tha. To date there have been very few comparative studies that have reported 10 year outcomes comparing ceramic on ceramic ceramic bearings to ceramic on highly crosslinked polyethylene polyethylene bearings in subjects aged 60 years or younger at the time of total hip arthroplasty tha 1 2 and to our knowledge no randomized clinical trial rct has reported 10 year outcomes.

This is a follow up to previously reported 5 year outcomes. Comparison of ceramic on ceramic bearing vs ceramic on highly cross linked polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head. Patients understand the risks that metal joints and sockets bring to their long term health and are moving away from the material. The ideal bearing surface for patients of avascular necrosis avn undergoing total hip arthroplasty tha remains controversial.

Comparison of ceramic on ceramic bearing vs ceramic on highly cross linked polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head. 2019 nov 27 14 1 388. Besides ceramic plating the only other option when it comes to bulletproof vests for sale is at least for now and in terms of being affordable is polyethylene. Ceramic on ceramic versus ceramic on polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the cost for ceramic on polyethylene c pe and ceramic on ceramic coc bearings used in primary total hip arthroplasty tha was changing over time and if the cost differential between ceramic bearings and metal on polyethylene m pe bearings was approaching the previously published tipping point for cost effectiveness of 325. A prospective cohort study with a mid term follow up bin feng1 yi ren2 shiliang cao2 jin lin1 jin jin1 wenwei qian1 and xisheng weng1 abstract. Hu d yang x tan y alaidaros m chen l. The choice between ceramic on ceramic coc and ceramic on polyethylene cop in primary total hip arthroplasty tha remains controversial.